![]() |
Art by Steven DeVon Jones |
William Wallace’s sword
has been rebuilt and preserved over the years. It is on display in Scotland,
but some historians believe only part of the sword’s blade was the original
sword of Wallace. A few hundred years can be hard on a sword. The hilt and
crossguard on William Wallace’s sword is different from the Claymore, but that
could be from its reconstruction. The part of the weapon believed as being the
original is a portion of the blade, which also verifies that it was never a Claymore.
The tip of the blade narrows towards the end to a point. The Claymore does not
narrow a whole lot until its triangular tip.
The name Claymore comes
from the Gaelic word "claidheamh mòr," which means Great-Sword. One thing that
made the Claymore stand out in comparison to other swords, including the other
types of two handed swords, was the leather wrapped ricasso that was between
the blade and the crossguard. The entire sword was long enough that the average
man could place the tip on the ground and the hilt would reach his armpit,
which is about four and a half feet.